Agree that having this definition is the best start - as taking you example it can clearly be shown that the women wearing the singlet is in no way bullying or harnessing as there was no behavior directed towards a worker or group the could lead to harm... however if the person that was making the complaint was to repetitively comment or show their displeasure with what the women wears then that could definitely be considered as bullying/harassmentI particularly like it because it has this definition " repeated and unreasonable behavior directed towards a worker or a group of workers that can lead to physical or psychological harm.". — Andrew
What hope is there for the rest of us if those that are in charge of writing the laws can't even understand them enough to follow them :wink:Given the allegations about misconduct in Parliament I wonder if the MPs and officials who wrote the Act thought about that. — Chris Peace
If you are interested in workplace health & safety in New Zealand, then this is the discussion forum for you.